Padgett v. State

554 So. 2d 623, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7267, 1989 WL 155526
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Padgett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 551 So. 2d 1259
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 1989·No. No. 88-1650·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of second degree murder with a firearm, two counts of attempted second degree murder with a firearm and one count of unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We affirm all but the latter conviction, and find it to be error under Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987) and Smith v. State, 539 So.2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The other points raised by the appellant as error we find not to be meritorious under Section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1987). Wherefore the conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense are hereby stricken from the judgment and sentence. The adjudication and sentences under review in all other respects be and they are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padgett v. State, 554 So. 2d 623, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7267, 1989 WL 155526 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

554 So. 2d 623 (Padgett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
539 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Carawan v. State
515 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)