Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Padgett v. State

Padgett v. State

534 So. 2d 1246, 1988 WL 135646
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1988·No. 86-2530·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

534 So.2d 1246 (1988)

Joe PADGETT, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-2530.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 20, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Burke, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joni B. Braunstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ., and ROBERT C. SCOTT, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Because the defendant claims and the state concedes that the trial court erred in not providing written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11), we vacate the sentence and remand with directions to the trial court to provide written reasons supporting the departure sentence. See State v. Johnson, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. McDavid, 532 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padgett v. State, 534 So. 2d 1246, 1988 WL 135646 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

534 So. 2d 1246 (Padgett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
593 So. 2d 1042 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Saint v. State
562 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Albury v. State
561 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Brown v. State
560 So. 2d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Joseph v. State
547 So. 2d 249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Pope v. State
542 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Albelo
541 So. 2d 778 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)