Noda v. State

534 So. 2d 1246, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5600, 1988 WL 135655
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1332
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 534 So. 2d 1246 (Noda v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noda v. State, 534 So. 2d 1246, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5600, 1988 WL 135655 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in the contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction. Neither the appellant’s evidentiary point nor his claim that the jury instructions were misleading was preserved below and neither presents fundamental error. Therefore, the judgment below is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padgett v. State
534 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 So. 2d 1246, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5600, 1988 WL 135655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noda-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.