Noda v. State
534 So. 2d 1246, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5600, 1988 WL 135655
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1988·No. No. 87-1332·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no merit in the contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction. Neither the appellant’s evidentiary point nor his claim that the jury instructions were misleading was preserved below and neither presents fundamental error. Therefore, the judgment below is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Noda v. State, 534 So. 2d 1246, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5600, 1988 WL 135655 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
534 So. 2d 1246 (Noda v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Padgett v. State
534 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)