Padgett v. State

553 So. 2d 774, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7129, 1989 WL 153778
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1989·No. No. 89-1407·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on a probation violation, the trial judge imposed a departure sentence greater than a one cell upward increase beyond that prescribed by the guidelines. As the state concedes, this was erroneous. Ree v. State (Fla. Case no. 71,424, opinion filed, November 16, 1989) [14 FLW 565]; Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Perez v. State, 554 So.2d 14 (Fla.3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the sentence under review is reversed with directions to resen-tence the defendant, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d 14, to no more than one cell above that otherwise provided by the sentencing guidelines.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padgett v. State, 553 So. 2d 774, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7129, 1989 WL 153778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

553 So. 2d 774 (Padgett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steinfeld v. Steinfeld
553 So. 2d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)