P. Sorensen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
246 F.2d 687, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 406, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5258, 1957 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,721
Opinion
The order of the Federal Trade Commission is affirmed. Clayton Act, § 2(a), 38 Stat. 730, as amended by Robinson-Patman Act; 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13. Moog Industries, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 8 Cir., 238 F.2d 43, certiorari granted on other grounds 353 U.S. 908, 77 S.Ct. 665, 1 L.Ed.2d 662; E. Edelman & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 239 F.2d 152; P. & D. Manufacturing Co., Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 245 F.2d 281.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
P. Sorensen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 246 F.2d 687, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 406, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5258, 1957 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,721 (D.C. Cir. 1957).
246 F.2d 687 (P. Sorensen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mid-South Distributors and Cotton States, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
287 F.2d 512 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)
American Motor Specialties Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
278 F.2d 225 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Standard Motor Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
265 F.2d 674 (Second Circuit, 1959)