Owner/Agent@DudeofNewYork v. U.S. Government

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK panne KX OWNER/AGENT@DUDEOFNEWYORK, Plaintiff, -against- 25 CIVIL 6007 (LLS) JUDGMENT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE/ PROVINCE (.GOV); CALIFORNIA (CA.GOV) (@CAGOVERNOR); GEORGIA (GEORGIA.GOV)(GOVERNOR.GEORGIA.GO); ILLINOIS (ILLINOIS.GOV); NEW YORK (NY.GOV); DELAWARE (DELAWARE.GOV); (VIRGINIA.GOV); SOUTH DAKOTA (SD.GOV); UTAH (UTAH.GOV); NORTH CAROLINA (NC.GOV); NJ (NJ.GOV), Defendants. panne KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated August 21, 2025, Plaintiff's complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(1) — (iii); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court warns Plaintiff that further meritless litigation in this district may result in an order barring him from filing new actions IFP unless he first obtains permission from the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York August 22, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court

K MMaAXGo BY: HK. MANGE

Deputy Clerk