Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Owens v. State

Owens v. State

616 So. 2d 573, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4028, 1993 WL 95499
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2763
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 573 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owens v. State, 616 So. 2d 573, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4028, 1993 WL 95499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of this Anders appeal, we have identified two minor sentencing errors. First, the public defender’s fee in the judgment are stricken and the matter remanded for the required notice and opportunity for the defendant to be heard before assessment. Carroll v. State, 602 So.2d 702 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and cases cited therein. Second, there is no authority for imposition of a state attorney’s fee and it is stricken. Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED in part and REMANDED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
606 So. 2d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Carroll v. State
602 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 573, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4028, 1993 WL 95499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.