Owens v. State

659 So. 2d 721, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9322, 1995 WL 518812
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 626 So. 2d 240
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 1995·No. No. 94-4163·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s second summary denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion. The case was before the trial court pursuant to this court’s decision in Owens v. State, 643 So.2d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), in which we reversed and remanded for further proceedings under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We must reverse and remand again because, although the trial court correctly determined that Appellant failed to request an appeal at sentencing, the court did not address Appellant’s general allegation that he requested defense counsel to file an appeal and defense counsel was ineffective in failing to do so. See, e.g., Gunn v. State, 612 So.2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. State, 659 So. 2d 721, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9322, 1995 WL 518812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 721 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gunn v. State
612 So. 2d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Owens v. State
643 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)