Owens v. State

224 So. 2d 363, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5502
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 24, 1969
DocketNo. 2125
StatusPublished

This text of 224 So. 2d 363 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owens v. State, 224 So. 2d 363, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue raised by this appeal is grounded on the admissibility of relevant testimony as to collateral crimes committed by the appellant. Our view of the proceeding in the trial court substantiates the relevancy of the testimony of other crimes, which showed a pattern of criminality. Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Hawkins v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 5.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawkins v. State
206 So. 2d 5 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Williams v. State
110 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 So. 2d 363, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.