Gilbert v. State
This text of 4 So. 2d 330 (Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal brings for review judgments of conviction of the offense of unlawfully living in an open state of adultery.
The sole challenge is to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.
The record discloses no motion for new trial. Therefore, review of error predicated on insufficiency of evidence is not available. See Schmids v. Tampa Pub. Co., 72 Fla. 571, 73 Sou. 593; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 106 Fla. 232, 143 Sou. 159; Davis *294 v. State, 47 Fla. 26, 36 Sou. 170; Florida Power Co. v. Cason, 79 Fla. 619, 84 Sou. 921; Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville, 86 Fla. 479, 98 Sou. 354; 356, citing Greenblatt v. Bissell Dry Goods Co., 85 Fla. 83, 95 Sou. 302; Johnson v. State, 53 Fla. 42, 43 Sou. 430; Thomas Bros. Co. v. Price, 56 Fla. 854, 48 Sou. 262.
No reversible error appearing from the record, the judgments are affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 So. 2d 330, 148 Fla. 293, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-state-fla-1941.