Owens v. State
224 So. 2d 363, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 So. 2d 627 →
Opinion
The issue raised by this appeal is grounded on the admissibility of relevant testimony as to collateral crimes committed by the appellant. Our view of the proceeding in the trial court substantiates the relevancy of the testimony of other crimes, which showed a pattern of criminality. Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Hawkins v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 5.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Owens v. State, 224 So. 2d 363, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
224 So. 2d 363 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawkins v. State
206 So. 2d 5 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Williams v. State
110 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)