Overton v. State

290 S.W. 165, 106 Tex. Crim. 1, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 1927·No. No. 10699.·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction in District Court of Somervell County of possessing equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment one year in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts seems to be incorporated in the transcript herein, which is in violation of the rules of the court. However, an examination of the transcript shows that same contains no sentence. In the absence of a sentence this court is without jurisdiction. The appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Overton v. State, 290 S.W. 165, 106 Tex. Crim. 1, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35 (Tex. 1927).

290 S.W. 165 (Overton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miles v. State
241 S.W.3d 28 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Brimage v. State
918 S.W.2d 466 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Wilson v. State
692 S.W.2d 661 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Miller v. State
708 S.W.2d 436 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Brown v. State
657 S.W.2d 797 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Gill v. State
625 S.W.2d 307 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Gillett v. State
588 S.W.2d 361 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)