Overton v. State

270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 596, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 269
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Overton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 Tex. Crim. 1
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 8, 1925·No. No. 8659.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the Criminal District Court of Travis county of rape, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.

*629 Winona Carrington testified that she was fourteen years old, and that appellant had carnally known her in Travis county within the period of limitation. She further testified that of this connection a child was born. The only evidence introduced in behalf of appellant was that his sister testified that he had never been convicted of a felony or charged with any offense prior to the instant charge. The facts seem sufficient to support the judgment.

But one bill of exceptions appears which was taken to the refusal of a new trial sought because of the lack of sufficient testimony. Same shows no error.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Overton v. State, 270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 596, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 269 (Tex. 1925).

270 S.W. 1118 (Overton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.