Osborne v. Welch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Osborne v. Welch

168 S.E.2d 897, 119 Ga. App. 853, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1278

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 9, 1969

Docket44406

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 S.E.2d 897 (Osborne v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborne v. Welch, 168 S.E.2d 897, 119 Ga. App. 853, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1278 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinions

Felton, Chief Judge.

In the absence of a certificate for immediate review (Code Ann. § 6-701 (2); Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; as amended by Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073), the appeal, from the [854]*854orders of the trial court overruling the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and his motion to dismiss the complaint on the pleadings, is premature and must be dismissed. Goldberg v. Monroe, 224 Ga. 693 (164 SE2d 123); Mize v. Rampey, 224 Ga. 806 (164 SE2d 816); Stewart v. Church, 119 Ga. App. 58 (166 SE2d 436); Housing Authority of the City of Decatur v. Baker, 119 Ga. App. 109 (166 SE2d 437).

Argued April 7, 1969 Decided May 9, 1969 Rehearing denied June 25, 1969. Dunaway, Shelfer, Haas & Newberry, John A. Dunaway, Hugh F. Newberry, for appellant. Arnold & Cate, William Cate, for appellees. Cook <fc Palmour, Joseph F. Loggins, McCamy, Minor, Phillips & Tuggle, John T. Minor, III, Matthews, Maddox, Walton & Smith, James D. Maddox, amicus curiae.

Appeal dismissed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, Chief Judge.

In the absence of a certificate for immediate review (Code Ann. § 6-701 (2); Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; as amended by Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073), the appeal, from the [854]*854orders of the trial court overruling the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and his motion to dismiss the complaint on the pleadings, is premature and must be dismissed. Goldberg v. Monroe, 224 Ga. 693 (164 SE2d 123); Mize v. Rampey, 224 Ga. 806 (164 SE2d 816); Stewart v. Church, 119 Ga. App. 58 (166 SE2d 436); Housing Authority of the City of Decatur v. Baker, 119 Ga. App. 109 (166 SE2d 437).

Argued April 7, 1969 Decided May 9, 1969 Rehearing denied June 25, 1969. Dunaway, Shelfer, Haas & Newberry, John A. Dunaway, Hugh F. Newberry, for appellant. Arnold & Cate, William Cate, for appellees. Cook <fc Palmour, Joseph F. Loggins, McCamy, Minor, Phillips & Tuggle, John T. Minor, III, Matthews, Maddox, Walton & Smith, James D. Maddox, amicus curiae.

Appeal dismissed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E.2d 897, 119 Ga. App. 853, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-welch-gactapp-1969.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack