Mize v. Rampey

164 S.E.2d 816, 224 Ga. 806, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 960
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 21, 1968·No. 24928, 24929·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Both the appeal and cross appeal are from judgments which would have been final if rendered as claimed by the appellant and cross appellant. However, the lower court did not certify within 10 days of the judgments here appealed from authorizing an “immediate review” as now required in such cases by Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; as amended April 8, 1968, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). See Goldberg v. Monroe, 224 Ga. 694 (164 SE2d 123). Accordingly, since the appeals are both premature, we have no alternative but to dismiss them.

Appeal and cross appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mize v. Rampey, 164 S.E.2d 816, 224 Ga. 806, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 960 (Ga. 1968).

164 S.E.2d 816 (Mize v. Rampey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terminal Transport Co. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.
194 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Akins v. Tucker
181 S.E.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Osborne v. Welch
168 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)