Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Mize v. Rampey

Mize v. Rampey

164 S.E.2d 816, 224 Ga. 806, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 960
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 21, 1968
Docket24928, 24929
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 164 S.E.2d 816 (Mize v. Rampey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mize v. Rampey, 164 S.E.2d 816, 224 Ga. 806, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 960 (Ga. 1968).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Both the appeal and cross appeal are from judgments which would have been final if rendered as claimed by the appellant and cross appellant. However, the lower court did not certify within 10 days of the judgments here appealed from authorizing an “immediate review” as now required in such cases by Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; as amended April 8, 1968, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). See Goldberg v. Monroe, 224 Ga. 694 (164 SE2d 123). Accordingly, since the appeals are both premature, we have no alternative but to dismiss them.

Appeal and cross appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terminal Transport Co. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.
194 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Akins v. Tucker
181 S.E.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Osborne v. Welch
168 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E.2d 816, 224 Ga. 806, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mize-v-rampey-ga-1968.