Goldberg v. Monroe
This text of 164 S.E.2d 123 (Goldberg v. Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where, as here, the judgment appealed from is one overruling general and special demurrers to a petition for specific performance, injunctive and other relief, and the lower court did not certify within 10 days of the order that “it is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had,” the appeal is premature, and we have no alternative but to dismiss it. Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; as amended, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 S.E.2d 123, 224 Ga. 693, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-monroe-ga-1968.