Goldberg v. Monroe
164 S.E.2d 123, 224 Ga. 693, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 907
Opinion
Where, as here, the judgment appealed from is one overruling general and special demurrers to a petition for specific performance, injunctive and other relief, and the lower court did not certify within 10 days of the order that “it is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had,” the appeal is premature, and we have no alternative but to dismiss it. Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; as amended, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldberg v. Monroe, 164 S.E.2d 123, 224 Ga. 693, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 907 (Ga. 1968).
164 S.E.2d 123 (Goldberg v. Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Petty v. State
183 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. State ex rel. Hancock
180 S.E.2d 704 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Aikens v. State
172 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Osborne v. Welch
168 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Hodge v. Dixon
167 S.E.2d 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Mize v. Rampey
164 S.E.2d 816 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Davis v. Davis
164 S.E.2d 816 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)