Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ortiz v. State

Ortiz v. State

835 So. 2d 1217, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 463, 2003 WL 142693
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ortiz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 743 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 2003·No. No. 4D02-1760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant refiling his public records request with the requisite specificity. See Roesch v. State, 633 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993); Wootton v. Cook, 590 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

FARMER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. State, 835 So. 2d 1217, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 463, 2003 WL 142693 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

835 So. 2d 1217 (Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wootton v. Cook
590 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Roesch v. State
633 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)