Ortiz v. State
808 So. 2d 1291, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3045, 2002 WL 384699
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ortiz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 743 →
Opinion
We affirm the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion. However, based on the state’s proper concession, we remand for trial court to correct the written sentence on count three to clarify that defendant is not sentenced as a Prison Releasee Reoffender on that count, and is only sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender on count three.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ortiz v. State, 808 So. 2d 1291, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3045, 2002 WL 384699 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
808 So. 2d 1291 (Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.