Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ortiz v. State

Ortiz v. State

820 So. 2d 1005, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2002 WL 1370035
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ortiz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 743 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2002·No. No. 4D02-1731·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Ortiz appeals an order of the trial court denying his motion to reduce or modify sentence on the basis that it was untimely filed. The record reveals and the state concedes appellant timely filed his mption within the sixty day period -prescribed by Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). We reverse and remand with directions for the trial court to rule on his motion based upon its merits.

STONE, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. State, 820 So. 2d 1005, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2002 WL 1370035 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

820 So. 2d 1005 (Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.