Oram v. Oram

Michigan Supreme Court

Oram v. Oram

777 N.W.2d 197, 485 Mich. 1082

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oram v. Oram. Read the opinion of the Court — 480 Mich. 1013 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 2010·No. 139925·Published

Opinion

777 N.W.2d 197 (2010)

Latif Z. ORAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph Z. ORAM, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 139925. COA No. 284576.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 29, 2010.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

777 N.W.2d 197 (2010)

Latif Z. ORAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph Z. ORAM, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 139925. COA No. 284576.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 29, 2010.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Oram v. Oram, 777 N.W.2d 197, 485 Mich. 1082 (Mich. 2010).

Pincite

777 N.W.2d 197 (Oram v. Oram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Latif Z. ORAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph Z. ORAM, Defendant-Appellee.

Order

Latif Z. ORAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph Z. ORAM, Defendant-Appellee.