Oram v. Oram
737 N.W.2d 730, 480 Mich. 852
This text of 737 N.W.2d 730 (Oram v. Oram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oram v. Oram, 737 N.W.2d 730, 480 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Latif Z. ORAM, a/k/a Randy Z. Oram, and OB Properties Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees, and
OB Properties, and Jam Sound Specialists, Inc., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
John ORAM and Gary Oram, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
International Outdoor Inc., Vision Properties, Discount Paging Co. Inc., and Future Vision Properties LLC, Third Party Defendants, and
Henry Cendrowski, Intervening Party-Appellee, and
Thav, Gross, Steinway & Bennett PC, and Armand Velardo, Intervening Parties, and
Abbott Nicholson PC, Intervening Party-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND *731 this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
737 N.W.2d 730, 480 Mich. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oram-v-oram-mich-2007.