Oram v. Oram
748 N.W.2d 881
Opinion
Latif Z. ORAM a/k/a Randy Z. Oram, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
O.B. Properties Limited Partnership, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendant, and
O.B. Properties and Jam Sound Specialist, Inc., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
John ORAM and Gary Oram, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees, and
International Outdoor, Inc., Vision Properties, Inc., Discount Paging Company, Inc., and Future Vision Properties, LLC, Third-Party Defendants, and
Armand Velardo, S. Haddad, and Bradley Lambert, Intervening Plaintiffs, and
Harry Cendrowski, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's April 11, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
WEAVER and CORRIGAN, JJ., would grant reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oram v. Oram, 748 N.W.2d 881 (Mich. 2008).
748 N.W.2d 881 (Oram v. Oram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pandy v. Board of Water and Light
748 N.W.2d 881 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)