Oquendo v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oquendo v. Goord

268 A.D.2d 630, 700 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 108

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 630 (Oquendo v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oquendo v. Goord, 268 A.D.2d 630, 700 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the underlying determination has been administratively reversed and all references to this matter have been expunged from petitioner’s records. Therefore, inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this proceeding is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Crawford v Senkowski, 264 AD2d 871; Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., [631]*631concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the underlying determination has been administratively reversed and all references to this matter have been expunged from petitioner’s records. Therefore, inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this proceeding is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Crawford v Senkowski, 264 AD2d 871; Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., [631]*631concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 630, 700 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oquendo-v-goord-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack