Witherspoon v. Goord

243 A.D.2d 931, 662 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10338
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by62 cases

This text of 243 A.D.2d 931 (Witherspoon v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witherspoon v. Goord, 243 A.D.2d 931, 662 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The determination under review in this proceeding has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s records. As petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of [932]*932Economy v Goord, 241 AD2d 605; Matter of Harrison v O'Keefe, 238 AD2d 655).

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paredes v. Carpenter
288 A.D.2d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Bennett v. Bintz
288 A.D.2d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Wright v. Goord
287 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Evans v. Goord
287 A.D.2d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Armstrong v. Murphy
285 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Rossi v. Selsky
285 A.D.2d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Nelson v. Portuondo
284 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Pena v. Goord
284 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Marlowe v. Selsky
284 A.D.2d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Santos v. Goord
284 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Kelly v. Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services
283 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Irons v. Goord
283 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Tyler v. Senkowski
282 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Perez v. Goord
279 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Smith v. Goord
279 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Diaz v. Selsky
278 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Mays v. Portuondo
277 A.D.2d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Torres v. Miller
276 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Saunders v. Allard
276 A.D.2d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Reese v. Goord
275 A.D.2d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D.2d 931, 662 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherspoon-v-goord-nyappdiv-1997.