Paredes v. Carpenter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paredes v. Carpenter

288 A.D.2d 739, 732 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11169

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 739 (Paredes v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paredes v. Carpenter, 288 A.D.2d 739, 732 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11169 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue herein has been administratively reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue herein has been administratively reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 739, 732 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paredes-v-carpenter-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack