Crawford v. Senkowski

264 A.D.2d 871, 693 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9016
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 9, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 A.D.2d 871 (Crawford v. Senkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crawford v. Senkowski, 264 A.D.2d 871, 693 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto will be expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oquendo v. Goord
268 A.D.2d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D.2d 871, 693 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-senkowski-nyappdiv-1999.