Opinion No.

CourtArkansas Attorney General Reports
DecidedJanuary 3, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. (Opinion No.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arkansas Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No., (Ark. 2002).

Opinion

Mr. Barry Emigh 1104 7th Street Hot Springs, AR 71913-4225

Dear Mr. Emigh:

You have requested certification, pursuant to A.C.A. § 7-9-107 (Repl. 2000), of a popular name and ballot title for a proposed constitutional amendment. You have previously submitted eight similar measures, six of which I rejected due to ambiguities in the text of your proposed amendments. See Op. Att'y Gen. Nos. 2001-358, 2001-341, 2001-173, 2001-110, 2001-095 and 2001-074. My office has revised and certified popular names and ballot titles for two similar measures, as evidenced by Op. Att'y Gen. Nos. 2001-129 and 2001-196. You have since made additional changes to your measure and submitted a revised popular name and ballot title for my certification. Your proposed popular name and ballot title state:

Popular Name
AN AMENDMENT TO AUTHORIZE BINGO AND RAFFLES BY NON PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, THE OPERATION OF GAMBLING AND A STATE LOTTERY

Ballot Title
AN AMENDMENT TO THE ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION AUTHORIZING THE OPERATION OF BINGO AND RAFFLES BY NON PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS INCORPORATED OR REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE WITH NO PERSON UNDER AGE 18 PERMITTED TO PLAY BINGO OR RAFFLES; PROVIDING EACH SIGNATURE THE SECRETARY OF STATE COUNTS AS VALID TO PLACE THIS AMENDMENT ON THE BALLOT WITH EXCEPTION OF A CANVASSER'S SIGNATURE ON A PETITION AS PETITIONER WITH THEIR SIGNATURE ON THAT PETITION AS CANVASSER SHALL BE COUNTED AS 2 SHARES OF STOCK WITH EACH SHARE OF STOCK BEING 1 VOTE WITH BARRY LEE EMIGH AS AUTHOR AND SPONSOR OF THIS AMENDMENT RECEIVING 1 OF 2 SHARES OF STOCK AS A STOCK HOLDER FOR EACH SIGNATURE A CANVASSER OBTAINS WITH THE CANVASSER RETAINING THE OTHER SHARE OF STOCK AS STOCK HOLDER WITH ALL SHARES OF STOCK BEING TRANSFERABLE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY; PROVIDING THE STOCK HOLDERS TO ORGANIZE AND OPERATE AS A CORPORATION WITHIN THE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE TO BE ENTITLED THE "CASINO CORPORATION OF ARKANSAS" WITHOUT COST OR FEE BY THE STATE, OR ANY SUBDIVISION OR AGENCY THEREOF, TO INCORPORATE IN THE STATE; AUTHORIZING THE" CASINO CORPORATION OF ARKANSAS" UPON INCORPORATION IN THE STATE TO OPERATE, HIRE AND SUBCONTRACT ANY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR(S) TO OPERATE GAMBLING WITHOUT LICENSE, FEE OR PERMIT BY THE STATE, OR ANY SUBDIVISION OR AGENCY THEREOF, ON ANY DAY FOR THE WHOLE OF A TWENTY-FOUR HOUR DAY WITH GAMBLING OPERATED WITHIN THE INTERIOR AREA OF NOT MORE THAN 12 STRUCTURES AT ANY ONE TIME WITHIN THE STATE OF WHICH STRUCTURES MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN ANY COUNTY, CITY AND TOWN OF THE STATE WITH NO PERSON UNDER AGE 21 PERMITTED TO GAMBLE; AUTHORIZING THE "CASINO CORPORATION OF ARKANSAS" AND THOSE PERSONS HIRED AND SUBCONTRACTED AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR(S) TO OPERATE GAMBLING TO SELL AND SERVE COMPLIMENTARY ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHOUT LICENSE, FEE OR PERMIT BY THE STATE, OR ANY SUBDIVISION OR AGENCY THEREOF, WITHIN THE INTERIOR AREA OF THOSE STRUCTURES USED FOR GAMBLING ONLY DURING THE OPERATION OF GAMBLING (INCLUDING THOSE COUNTIES, CITIES AND TOWNS IN WHICH THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED) WITH NO PERSON UNDER AGE 21 PERMITTED TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; REQUIRING THE "CASINO CORPORATION OF ARKANSAS" AND THOSE PERSONS HIRED AND SUBCONTRACTED AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS TO OPERATE GAMBLING AS APPLICABLE TO OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL OTHER LICENSES AND PERMITS NOT EXEMPTED WITHIN THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AMENDMENT AND PAY ALL STATE AND LOCAL TAXES AS REQUIRED; AUTHORIZING THE LEGAL SHIPMENT OF GAMING DEVICES; DEFINING "GAMBLING" AS THE RISKING OF MONEY ON A CHANCE BETWEEN PERSONS WHERE ONE IS LOSER AND OTHER GAINER WITH COMMONLY CALLED GAMBLING AND GAMING DEVICES TO INCLUDE ANY KIND OF ROULETTE WHEELS, ANY KIND OF SLOT MACHINES, GAMING TABLES OF ANY KIND FOR THE USE OF CARDS AND DICE USED IN ANY MANNER AND ANY KIND OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING; DEFINING "STRUCTURES" AS THE PLURAL OF STRUCTURE WITH STRUCTURE BEING ANY KIND AND SIZE OF BUILDING TO INCLUDE ANY ATTACHED ADDITIONS TO BE CONSIDERED PART OF THAT BUILDING AND TO INCLUDE WITHIN THIS DEFINITION ANY KIND AND SIZE OF ANCHORED WATER VESSEL AS A STRUCTURE; EMPOWERING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO ESTABLISH AND REGULATE A COMMISSION TO REGULATE BINGO AND RAFFLES OPERATED BY NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, TO REGULATE GAMBLING OPERATED BY THE "CASINO CORPORATION OF ARKANSAS" AND THOSE PERSONS HIRED AND SUBCONTRACTED AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS TO OPERATE GAMBLING AND FOR THE COMMISSION TO OPERATE A STATE LOTTERY IN ANY MANNER AND IN COMBINATION WITH ANY OTHER STATE AND STATES; MAKING THE PROVISIONS OF THE AMENDMENT SELF EXECUTING AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON PASSAGE EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THE AMENDMENT; MAKING THE AMENDMENT SEVERABLE; AND REPEALING ALL LAWS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS IN CONFLICT WITH THIS AMENDMENT.

The Attorney General is required, pursuant to A.C.A. § 7-9-107, to certify the popular name and ballot title of all proposed initiative and referendum acts or amendments before the petitions are circulated for signature. The law provides that the Attorney General may substitute and certify a more suitable and correct popular name and ballot title, if he can do so, or if the proposed popular name and ballot title are sufficiently misleading, may reject the entire petition.

A.C.A. § 7-9-107 neither requires nor authorizes this office to make legal determinations concerning the merits of the act or amendment, or concerning the likelihood that it will accomplish its stated objective. Consequently, this review has been limited to a determination, pursuant to the guidelines that have been set forth by the Arkansas Supreme Court, discussed below, of whether the proposed popular name and ballot title accurately and impartially summarize the provisions of your proposed amendment.

The purpose of my review and certification is to ensure that the popular name and ballot title honestly, intelligibly, and fairly set forth the purpose of the proposed amendment. See Arkansas Women's Political Caucusv. Riviere, 282 Ark. 463, 466, 677 S.W.2d 846 (1984).

The popular name is primarily a useful legislative device. Pafford v.Hall, 217 Ark. 734, 233 S.W.2d 72 (1950). It need not contain detailed information or include exceptions that might be required of a ballot title, but it must not be misleading or give partisan coloring to the merit of the proposal. Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294, 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411, 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). The popular name is to be considered together with the ballot title in determining the ballot title's sufficiency. Id.

The ballot title must include an impartial summary of the proposed amendment that will give the voter a fair understanding of the issues presented. Hoban v. Hall, 229 Ark. 416, 417,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaines v. McCuen
758 S.W.2d 403 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1988)
Hoban v. Hall
316 S.W.2d 185 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1958)
Moore v. Hall
316 S.W.2d 207 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1958)
Pafford v. Hall
233 S.W.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1950)
Chaney v. Bryant
532 S.W.2d 741 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1976)
Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture
793 S.W.2d 27 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Bailey v. McCuen
884 S.W.2d 938 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuen
884 S.W.2d 605 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Becker v. Riviere
604 S.W.2d 555 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1980)
Leigh v. Hall
339 S.W.2d 104 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1960)
Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuen
841 S.W.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)
Finn v. McCuen
798 S.W.2d 34 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)
Becker v. McCuen
798 S.W.2d 71 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)
Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. Riviere
677 S.W.2d 846 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1984)
Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of State
97 S.W.2d 81 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-arkag-2002.