Opinion No.

CourtArkansas Attorney General Reports
DecidedJanuary 2, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. (Opinion No.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arkansas Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No., (Ark. 1997).

Opinion

The Honorable James C. Scott State Senator 321 State Highway 15 North Warren, Arkansas 71671

Dear Senator Scott:

This official Attorney General opinion is issued in response to your recent questions regarding school districts' leave policies. You have asked:

(1) Is it legal for a school district to establish a leave policy allowing an employee who has been elected to public office to serve in that office while remaining as an employee of the school district?

(2) If such a leave is permissible, would it be legal to pay the salary or a portion thereof to that employee while he or she is absent from his or her job assignment?

(3) Is it permissible for an Arkansas school district to have a certified teacher leave policy that would provide for "civic leave" to certified employees while such employees participate in the meetings or sessions of any state board, city council, quorum court, or General Assembly of which they may be members?

(4) If the response to Question 3 is affirmative, could such a leave policy provide for full pay to the employee while participating in such a meeting?

(5) Could such a leave policy provide that the cost of a substitute teacher be withheld from the employees' salaries during their attendance at such meetings or events?

RESPONSE

Question 1Is it legal for a school district to establish a leavepolicy allowing an employee who has been elected to public office to servein that office while remaining as an employee of the school district?

It is my opinion that it is legal for school districts to establish such a leave policy.

The Arkansas courts have consistently recognized the wide latitude and discretion that is granted to school districts in establishing their own policies; the courts will not interfere with the decisions of local school boards in the absence of an abuse of discretion or a conflict with clearly enunciated restrictions of state or federal law. King v.Cochran, 419 F.Supp. 54 (W.D. Ark. 1976), aff'd 551 F.2d 1133; Cato v.Collins, 394 F.Supp. 629 (E.D. Ark. 1975), aff'd 539 F.2d 656; Appler v.Mountain Pine School Dist., 342 F.Supp. 1131 (W.D. Ark. 1972); Evans v.McKinley, 234 Ark. 472, 352 S.W.2d 829 (1962); Safferstone v. Tucker,235 Ark. 70, 357 S.W.2d 3 (1962); Coffelt v. Nicholson, 224 Ark. 176,272 S.W.2d 309 (1954); Pugsley v. Sellmeyer, 158 Ark. 247, 250 S.W.2d 538 (1923).

The wide discretion that is granted to local school boards may be inferred from the provisions of A.C.A. § 6-13-620, which states:

The board of directors of each school district in the state shall be charged with the following powers and perform the following duties:

* * *

(13) Do all other things necessary and lawful for the conduct of efficient free public schools in the district.

A.C.A. § 6-13-620(13).

Moreover, the legislature has mandated that local school boards create personnel policies for their districts. See A.C.A. § 6-17-201.

There is no state or federal law that would prohibit a school district from establishing a leave policy allowing an employee who has been elected to public office to serve in that office while remaining as an employee of the school district — provided that the elected office is one that a school district employee would not be prohibited from holding under the principles of law governing dual office holding.1 See,e.g., Op. Att'y Gen. No. 88-178.

Indeed, a general legislative policy in favor of such leave is reflected in other laws that specifically provide for leaves of absence for the purpose of fulfilling a public duty. In fact, the provisions of A.C.A. §21-4-101 could be interpreted to actually require a policy allowing a leave of absence for the purpose of serving a term in an elective office. That statute states:

(a) Any person who is employed by any person, firm, or corporation in the State of Arkansas shall be granted a leave of absence, upon the election of any such employee to a public office in the State of Arkansas, or upon appointment by the Governor of any such person to a board or commission in the State of Arkansas, which office requires their absence from their employment.

(b) The leave of absence shall be for such period as the employee may request, not to exceed the duration of the term of office to which the employee has been elected.

(c) The granting of the leave of absence by the employer shall not be held to impair the employee's seniority rights of the job, nor shall the departmental seniority of the employee be broken for job purposes.

A.C.A. § 21-4-101.2 It is unclear whether the mandate of the foregoing section extends to school districts. The language of the provision does not specify its exact applicability, and the Arkansas Supreme Court has never addressed the question. Nevertheless, a policy allowing leave for service in an elected office would certainly be consistent with the legislature's public policy intent as reflected in this statute. See also A.C.A. § 6-17-306; A.C.A. § 21-4-212.

I therefore conclude that, with the provisos noted above, such a leave policy is generally permissible.

Question 2 — If such a leave is permissible, would it be legal to pay thesalary or a portion thereof to that employee while he or she is absentfrom his or her job assignment?

It is my opinion that although school districts could allow their employees a leave of absence for public service, the school district's payment of the salary of employees who are on leave would be inappropriate. Such payment, in my opinion, would violate Article 14, §§ 2 and 3 of the Arkansas Constitution, which prohibit the use of school funds for any purpose that does not benefit the schools for which the funds were collected.

I have previously opined that continued payment of salary to an employee who is on leave for active military duty would violate these constitutional provisions. See Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-330.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marvin S. King v. Gary Cochran
551 F.2d 1133 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)
Cato v. Collins
394 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. Arkansas, 1975)
Coffelt v. Nicholson
272 S.W.2d 309 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1954)
Safferstone v. Tucker
357 S.W.2d 3 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1962)
Appler v. Mountain Pine School District
342 F. Supp. 1131 (W.D. Arkansas, 1972)
Magnolia School District No. 14 v. Arkansas State Board of Education
799 S.W.2d 791 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)
Pugsley v. Sellmeyer
250 S.W. 538 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1923)
Evans v. McKinley
352 S.W.2d 829 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1962)
King v. Cochran
419 F. Supp. 54 (W.D. Arkansas, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-arkag-1997.