O'Neill v. Beisheim

352 N.E.2d 880, 39 N.Y.2d 924, 386 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2875
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1976·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Prohibition is not now warranted where the trial sought to be prohibited has been held and where the issues tendered may be raised on the direct appeal following such trial now pending in the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Neill v. Beisheim, 352 N.E.2d 880, 39 N.Y.2d 924, 386 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2875 (N.Y. 1976).

352 N.E.2d 880 (O'Neill v. Beisheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Seiler v. Crandall
2020 NY Slip Op 06603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Coffee v. Argento
2019 NY Slip Op 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
DALE, DAVID v. BURNS, HON. CHRISTOPHER J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Dale v. Burns
103 A.D.3d 1243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Kinnaman v. Doran
278 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. O'Neill
59 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People ex rel. Pendleton v. Smith
54 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)