Kinnaman v. Doran

278 A.D.2d 923, 718 N.Y.S.2d 540, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13454
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Proceeding unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this original proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit his trial [924]*924upon the charges in Ontario County indictment No. 99-10-213 on the ground that the prosecution of those charges is barred by the constitutional and statutory protections against double jeopardy (see, US Const 5th Amend; NY Const, art I, § 6; CPL 40.20). The trial of that indictment has been held and the proceeding therefore must be dismissed. “Prohibition is not now warranted where the trial sought to be prohibited has been held and where the issues tendered may be raised on the direct appeal following such trial” (Matter of O’Neill v Beisheim, 39 NY2d 924, 925). (Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinnaman v. Doran, 278 A.D.2d 923, 718 N.Y.S.2d 540, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 923 (Kinnaman v. Doran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DALE, DAVID v. BURNS, HON. CHRISTOPHER J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Dale v. Burns
103 A.D.3d 1243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)