One-Two East 87th St. Corp. v. Rees
This text of 35 Misc. 2d 158 (One-Two East 87th St. Corp. v. Rees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The proof clearly establishes a violation of the express terms of the lease, projected into the statutory tenancy. The mere fact that tenant’s friend paid her no rent for the occupancy does not affect the fact that such use of the apartment, without landlord’s consent, violates the lease (Irweis Holding Corp. v. Glenn, 2 Misc 2d 804; 820 E. 57th St. Corp. v. Peckham, 63 N. Y. S. 2d 357). The circumstances indicated that such use and occupancy was more than a mere visit or temporary expedient.
The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs.
Concur— Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Tilzbr, JJ.
Final order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 2d 158, 232 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/one-two-east-87th-st-corp-v-rees-nyappterm-1962.