Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Irweis Holding Corp. v. Glenn

Irweis Holding Corp. v. Glenn

2 Misc. 2d 804, 153 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1828
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 24, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2 Misc. 2d 804 (Irweis Holding Corp. v. Glenn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irweis Holding Corp. v. Glenn, 2 Misc. 2d 804, 153 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proof indisputably indicated a violation of the express terms of the lease, projected into the statutory tenancy, of use by “ tenant’s immediate family only” and against occupancy ‘‘ in whole or in part by any other person ’’ or “ by parties other than as aforesaid ’’. Even if tenants ’ evidence were accepted, a third cousin is obviously not a member of one’s immediate family. Sufficient notice and adequate time [805]*805were given to terminate the prohibited occupancy, but tenants refused to correct the situation on the ground that they had a right to help this “ third cousin ” temporarily until she found a new place. The circumstances indicate that the occupancy was not a mere visit or a temporary expedient. The property is landlord’s subject only to tenants’ use within the terms of the lease. The persistent violation is clear despite the protestations of tenants that they are not receiving any rent from the occupant.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs.

Hofstadter, Eder and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Pinal order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leonedas Realty Corp. v. Brodowsky
115 Misc. 2d 88 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)
King v. Menachem
113 Misc. 2d 63 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Hudson View Properties v. Weiss
109 Misc. 2d 589 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Equity Investments v. Paris
108 Misc. 2d 404 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1981)
Mihil Co. v. Paradiso
107 Misc. 2d 867 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1980)
Fraydun Enterprises v. Ettinger
88 Misc. 2d 617 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)
Bohmfalk v. Zima
58 Misc. 2d 357 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1968)
One-Two East 87th St. Corp. v. Rees
35 Misc. 2d 158 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Misc. 2d 804, 153 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irweis-holding-corp-v-glenn-nyappterm-1956.