Fraydun Enterprises v. Ettinger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fraydun Enterprises v. Ettinger

91 Misc. 2d 119, 397 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2248

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 91 Misc. 2d 119 (Fraydun Enterprises v. Ettinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fraydun Enterprises v. Ettinger, 91 Misc. 2d 119, 397 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Final judgment entered December 14, 1976 (Lane, J.) reversed, without costs, and final judgment directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs, subject, however, to the following:

Provided undertenant either permanently removes from the premises, or becomes a member of tenant’s immediate family, within 60 days after service of a copy of the order entered hereon with notice of entry, issuance of the warrant is stayed until the further order of this court.

The tenant breached a substantial obligation of the tenancy by permitting undertenant, a person other than a member of his immediate family (and to whom he is presently engaged) to occupy the demised premises. The breach is material and sufficient to warrant termination of the tenancy if undertenant does not become a member of tenant’s family within the time herein limited (Jema Props, v McLeod, NYLJ, June 7, 1976, p 8, col 1; One-Two East 87th St. Corp. v Rees, 35 Misc 2d 158). Nor does the record establish a waiver of the breach by landlord. If, however, undertenant becomes a member of tenant’s immediate family (as appears imminent), or removes from the apartment, within the period of time herein provided, issuance of the warrant will be stayed until the further order of this court.

[120]*120Concur: Dudley, P. J., Hughes and Riccobono, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Final judgment entered December 14, 1976 (Lane, J.) reversed, without costs, and final judgment directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs, subject, however, to the following:

Provided undertenant either permanently removes from the premises, or becomes a member of tenant’s immediate family, within 60 days after service of a copy of the order entered hereon with notice of entry, issuance of the warrant is stayed until the further order of this court.

The tenant breached a substantial obligation of the tenancy by permitting undertenant, a person other than a member of his immediate family (and to whom he is presently engaged) to occupy the demised premises. The breach is material and sufficient to warrant termination of the tenancy if undertenant does not become a member of tenant’s family within the time herein limited (Jema Props, v McLeod, NYLJ, June 7, 1976, p 8, col 1; One-Two East 87th St. Corp. v Rees, 35 Misc 2d 158). Nor does the record establish a waiver of the breach by landlord. If, however, undertenant becomes a member of tenant’s immediate family (as appears imminent), or removes from the apartment, within the period of time herein provided, issuance of the warrant will be stayed until the further order of this court.

[120]*120Concur: Dudley, P. J., Hughes and Riccobono, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 Misc. 2d 119, 397 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraydun-enterprises-v-ettinger-nyappterm-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack