O'Mara v. Curtin
This text of 268 A.D. 888 (O'Mara v. Curtin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Marion v. Coon Construction Co. (216 N. Y. 178) and Gursslin v. Helenboldt (259 App. Div. 1064). All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 888, 51 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omara-v-curtin-nyappdiv-1944.