Gursslin v. Helenboldt
This text of 259 A.D. 1064 (Gursslin v. Helenboldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: It was prejudicial error to permit plaintiff’s expert medical witness to testify over defendants’ objection and exception to matters shown by the X-rays without introducing the X-ray pictures in evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1064, 21 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gursslin-v-helenboldt-nyappdiv-1940.