Gursslin v. Helenboldt
259 A.D. 1064, 21 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1940·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: It was prejudicial error to permit plaintiff’s expert medical witness to testify over defendants’ objection and exception to matters shown by the X-rays without introducing the X-ray pictures in evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gursslin v. Helenboldt, 259 A.D. 1064, 21 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
259 A.D. 1064 (Gursslin v. Helenboldt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schozer v. William Penn Life Insurance
644 N.E.2d 1353 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Sirico v. Cotto
67 Misc. 2d 636 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1971)
Cellamare v. Third Avenue Transit Corp.
273 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
O'Mara v. Curtin
268 A.D. 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)