Gursslin v. Helenboldt

259 A.D. 1064, 21 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 28, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 1064 (Gursslin v. Helenboldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gursslin v. Helenboldt, 259 A.D. 1064, 21 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: It was prejudicial error to permit plaintiff’s expert medical witness to testify over defendants’ objection and exception to matters shown by the X-rays without introducing the X-ray pictures in evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schozer v. William Penn Life Insurance
644 N.E.2d 1353 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Sirico v. Cotto
67 Misc. 2d 636 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1971)
Cellamare v. Third Avenue Transit Corp.
273 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
O'Mara v. Curtin
268 A.D. 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 1064, 21 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gursslin-v-helenboldt-nyappdiv-1940.