Cellamare v. Third Avenue Transit Corp.

273 A.D. 260, 77 N.Y.S.2d 91
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 1948·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was prejudicial error to permit plaintiff’s expert medical witness, who took X-ray pictures of the plaintiff, to testify, over defendant’s objection and exception, to matters shown on the X rays and to findings based thereon, without producing the X-ray pictures and introducing them in evidence (3 Wigmore on Evidence, § 795; Gursslin v. Helenboldt, 259 App. Div. 1064; Marion v. Coon Construction Co., 216 N. Y. 178; O’Mara v. Curtin, 268 App. Div. 888). The judgment, should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cellamare v. Third Avenue Transit Corp., 273 A.D. 260, 77 N.Y.S.2d 91 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 260 (Cellamare v. Third Avenue Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schozer v. William Penn Life Insurance
644 N.E.2d 1353 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Hambsch v. New York City Transit Authority
469 N.E.2d 516 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Sirico v. Cotto
67 Misc. 2d 636 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1971)