Ohio ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co.
82 Ohio Law. Abs. 321
Opinion
OPINION
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed. Straw-bridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cranch 267; Removal Cases, 100 U. S. 457; Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 314 U. S. 63.
For opinions in U. S. District Court and U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals, see 82 Abs 152 and 82 Abs 158.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ohio ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co., 82 Ohio Law. Abs. 321 (6th Cir. 1959).
82 Ohio Law. Abs. 321 (Ohio ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strawbridge v. Curtiss
7 U.S. 267 (Supreme Court, 1806)
Meyer v. Construction Company
100 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 1879)
City of Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank
314 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1941)
State of Ohio, on the Relation of Paul T. Klapp, Prosecuting Attorney v. Dayton Power & Light Co.
263 F.2d 909 (Sixth Circuit, 1959)
State ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co.
170 F. Supp. 722 (S.D. Ohio, 1957)