Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff
This text of 709 N.E.2d 111 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Bart (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 538, 687 N.E.2d 681, and Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 280, 690 N.E.2d 1271, were cases involving facts similar to these. In those cases we imposed a one-year suspension with full credit for time served under the interim suspension. We adopt the board’s recommendation that we impose the same sanction in this case. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year with full credit for time served. Cost are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 N.E.2d 111, 85 Ohio St. 3d 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-petroff-ohio-1999.