Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff

709 N.E.2d 111, 85 Ohio St. 3d 396

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 1999·No. No. 98-2641·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Bart (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 538, 687 N.E.2d 681, and Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 280, 690 N.E.2d 1271, were cases involving facts similar to these. In those cases we imposed a one-year suspension with full credit for time served under the interim suspension. We adopt the board’s recommendation that we impose the same sanction in this case. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year with full credit for time served. Cost are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Bart (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 538, 687 N.E.2d 681, and Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 280, 690 N.E.2d 1271, were cases involving facts similar to these. In those cases we imposed a one-year suspension with full credit for time served under the interim suspension. We adopt the board’s recommendation that we impose the same sanction in this case. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year with full credit for time served. Cost are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff, 709 N.E.2d 111, 85 Ohio St. 3d 396 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

709 N.E.2d 111 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related