Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Bart

687 N.E.2d 681, 80 Ohio St. 3d 538
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1997·No. No. 97-1747·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with credit for the time served during his interim suspension which commenced on November 26,1996. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Bart, 687 N.E.2d 681, 80 Ohio St. 3d 538 (Ohio 1997).

687 N.E.2d 681 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Bart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Malley
2010 Ohio 3802 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff
1999 Ohio 400 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff
709 N.E.2d 111 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Bart
1998 Ohio 494 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)