O.D. v. State

614 So. 2d 23, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2045
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 1993·No. No. 91-03347·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

This appeal arises from the state charging the appellant by juvenile petition with the assault of Patrick Dawson. Mr. Dawson and his wife testified that the appellant stated to Mr. Dawson: “Before I’m twenty-one, you will be dead.” At the time the appellant made the statement, he did not have a weapon; Mr. Dawson was in his own yard behind a fence and the appellant was across the road. At the close of the state’s case, the appellant made a motion [24]*24for judgment of acquittal, which the trial court denied.

The state failed to prove the essential elements of assault. See § 784.011, Fla. Stat. (1991). The state’s evidence failed to show that the appellant directed an overt act at Mr. Dawson to place him in fear. See Lifka v. State, 530 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Battles v. State, 288 So.2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 295 So.2d 302 (Fla.1974). The state’s evidence also failed to show a well-founded fear that violence was imminent. See Johnson v. Brooks, 567 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Thus, the trial court should have granted the appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the state’s case.

Reversed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O.D. v. State, 614 So. 2d 23, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

614 So. 2d 23 (O.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

P.R. v. State
782 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Carter v. State
730 So. 2d 824 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
OD v. State
614 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)