O.D. v. State

584 So. 2d 1138, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9545, 1991 WL 181453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 1991
DocketNo. 90-2262
StatusPublished

This text of 584 So. 2d 1138 (O.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O.D. v. State, 584 So. 2d 1138, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9545, 1991 WL 181453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The state has correctly conceded the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the conclusion below that the respondent was guilty as a principal in the crime of rob[1139]*1139bery. See G.C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.L.B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.H. v. State, 370 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 209 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is reversed and the respondent is ordered discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. H. v. State
370 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
J. L. B. v. State
396 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
G. C. v. State
407 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
584 So. 2d 1138, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9545, 1991 WL 181453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/od-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.