O.D. v. State
584 So. 2d 1138, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9545, 1991 WL 181453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O.D. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2045 →
Opinion
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
The state has correctly conceded the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the conclusion below that the respondent was guilty as a principal in the crime of rob[1139]*1139bery. See G.C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.L.B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.H. v. State, 370 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 209 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is reversed and the respondent is ordered discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O.D. v. State, 584 So. 2d 1138, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9545, 1991 WL 181453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
584 So. 2d 1138 (O.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. H. v. State
370 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
J. L. B. v. State
396 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
G. C. v. State
407 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)