Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Beavers

95 S.E. 735, 22 Ga. App. 201, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 246
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 11, 1918
Docket9177
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 735 (Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Beavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Beavers, 95 S.E. 735, 22 Ga. App. 201, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 246 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The petition as amended, was sufficient to withstand the demurrer, and the court ’did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and'Harwell, J., eoneur.

[202]*202The defendant demurred to 'the petition generally, and demurred specially to the allegations as to the danger that the plaintiff saw before leaping, and to the allegations of negligence.

Wall & Grantham, Quincey & Rice, for plaintiff in error, cited:

Walker v. A. & W. P. R. Co., 103 Ga. 820, 822-3; Blackstone v. Cen. Ry. Co., 112 Ga. 762; Price v. Cen. Ry. Co., 124 Ga. 899; E. T. &c. R. Co. v. Head, 92 Ga. 723; Stewart v. S. A. L. Ry., 115 Ga. 624; Roland v. Tift, 131 Ga. 683 (2); Hendrix v. Mfg. Co., 134 Ga. 712; Beck v. Tumlin Co., 13 Ga. App. 618; Kilgo v. Rome Mfg. Co., 16 Ga. App. 737 (4); McDonnell v. Cen. Ry. Co., 118 Ga. 89-90, and cases cited.

Shipp & Sheppard, contra,. cited:

Gainesville &c. Ry. v. Vandiver, 144 Ga. 852; Callahan v. W. & A. R. Co., 137 Ga. 726; Simmons v. E. T. &c. Ry. Co., 92 Ga. 658, and cases cited; Smith v. R. Co., 83 Ga. 671; Ga. R. Co. v. Rhodes, 56 Ga. 646; M. & W. R. Co. v. Winn, 26 Ga. 250; Cen. R. Co. v. Sanders, 73 Ga. 513 (3); Charleston &c. R. Co. v. Lyons, 5 Ga. App. 668 (2); Cen. Ry. v. Brandenburg, 129 Ga. 117; Standard Cotton Mills T. Cheatam, 125 Ga. 649; Charleston &c. Ry. Co. v. Attaway, 7 Ga. App. 231.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Macon & Western Railroad v. Winn
26 Ga. 250 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)
Central Railroad v. Sanders
73 Ga. 513 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)
Smith v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad
10 S.E. 361 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
Simmons v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.
18 S.E. 999 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)
East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Head
18 S.E. 976 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)
Walker v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad
30 S.E. 503 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Blackstone v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
38 S.E. 79 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Stewart v. Seaboard Air Line Railway
41 S.E. 981 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Price v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
53 S.E. 455 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Standard Cotton Mills v. Cheatham
54 S.E. 650 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Roland v. Tift
63 S.E. 133 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Hendrix v. Vale Royal Manufacturing Co.
68 S.E. 483 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Callahan v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
74 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Gainesville Midland Railway v. Vandiver
88 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Lyons
63 S.E. 862 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Attaway
66 S.E. 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Beck v. Albert N. Tumlin Co.
79 S.E. 587 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Kilgo v. Rome Soil Pipe Manufacturing Co.
86 S.E. 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 735, 22 Ga. App. 201, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocilla-southern-railroad-v-beavers-gactapp-1918.