Blackstone v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
This text of 38 S.E. 79 (Blackstone v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the trial of an action for damages against a railroad company it appeared that the plaintiff was injured by being knocked from a moving train in the yard of the defendant by an electric-light pole which was erected too near the track, that the plaintiff was a yardmaster in the employ of the defendant, and that not only were his duties as yardmaster and his familiarity with the yard such as to charge him with knowledge of the location of the pole, but there was evidence tending to show that he had actual knowledge of its location. Held, that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and a nonsuit was properly awarded in the case. See East Tenn. Rwy. Co. v. Head, 92 Ga. 723; Walker v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad Co., 103 Ga. 820; Blackstone v. Railway Co., 105 Ga. 381, 383.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 S.E. 79, 112 Ga. 762, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackstone-v-central-of-georgia-railway-co-ga-1901.