Oatsvall v. State
444 So. 2d 560, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11690
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 1984·No. No. AW-7·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Contending his guilty plea to a charge of escape was not knowingly and intelligently made, Oatsvall appeals the trial court’s order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The waiver and consent form attached to the order shows Oatsvall was informed of his rights, knew the maximum penalty, knowingly waived a jury trial, and pled freely and voluntarily. The form was signed by Oatsvall and his attorney and approved by the trial court when the plea was accepted.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oatsvall v. State, 444 So. 2d 560, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11690 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
444 So. 2d 560 (Oatsvall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McElvane v. State
553 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)