Oatsvall v. State
This text of 444 So. 2d 560 (Oatsvall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contending his guilty plea to a charge of escape was not knowingly and intelligently made, Oatsvall appeals the trial court’s order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The waiver and consent form attached to the order shows Oatsvall was informed of his rights, knew the maximum penalty, knowingly waived a jury trial, and pled freely and voluntarily. The form was signed by Oatsvall and his attorney and approved by the trial court when the plea was accepted.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 So. 2d 560, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oatsvall-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.