Nunez v. Silber

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAVIER NUNEZ, Plaintiff, 1:18-CV-0892 (CM) -against- MARK, SILBER; ELI SILBER; NICOLE BAR ORDER UNDER FRASER; GUTMAN, MINTE, BAKER & 28 U.S.C. § 1651 SONNENFELDT, LLC, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, United States District Judge: By order dated January 10, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, who appears pro se, to show cause by declaration, within 30 days, why the Court should not bar Plaintiff from filing any future submission in this action, with the exception of a notice of appeal. Seven days later, on January 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed a declaration, but his arguments against imposing the bar order are insufficient. Accordingly, the bar order will issue. CONCLUSION The Court hereby bars Plaintiff from filing any future submission in this action, with the exception of a notice of appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651. The Court warns Plaintiff that any violations of this filing injunction may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. See id. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of court documents. (ECF 3.) SO ORDERED. Dated: January 28, 2022 New York, New York hie. Iu Wyk United States District Judge