Nunez v. City of Hialeah

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nunez v. City of Hialeah

477 So. 2d 655, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2484, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16549

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 1985·No. No. 85-2417·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enjoin the scheduled election on a proposed City of Hialeah charter amendment, see State ex rel. Landis v. Tedder, 106 Fla. 140, 143 So. 148 (1932); City of Miami Beach v. Herman, 346 So.2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), because, as in the identical and controlling case of City of Miami v. Rolle, 446 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), the city did not comply with the time frame required by § 5.03A of the Dade County Home Rule Charter.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained and the mandate will issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enjoin the scheduled election on a proposed City of Hialeah charter amendment, see State ex rel. Landis v. Tedder, 106 Fla. 140, 143 So. 148 (1932); City of Miami Beach v. Herman, 346 So.2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), because, as in the identical and controlling case of City of Miami v. Rolle, 446 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), the city did not comply with the time frame required by § 5.03A of the Dade County Home Rule Charter.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained and the mandate will issue forthwith.

Nunez v. City of Hialeah, 477 So. 2d 655, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2484, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16549 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

477 So. 2d 655 (Nunez v. City of Hialeah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related