Bullard v. State
This text of 477 So. 2d 655 (Bullard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Diane D. BULLARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
PER CURIAM.
Diane Bullard appeals the summary denial of her motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse.
*656 Bullard alleged that both a detective and her trial attorney promised her a maximum sentence of five years if she would plead guilty to several felony charges. Instead, she received seven separate five-year sentences, some concurrent and some consecutive, for a total of fifteen years in prison. If Bullard's allegations are true, she might be entitled to relief on the theory her plea was not freely and voluntarily entered. See, e.g., Ream v. State, 449 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
We therefore remand this case to the trial court with directions either to afford Bullard a hearing on the issue of the voluntariness of her plea, or to attach sufficient portions of the record to refute Bullard's claims. If the trial court rules in Bullard's favor, Bullard should be permitted to withdraw her plea if she so desires. If the trial court again denies the motion, Bullard must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain further appellate review.
REVERSED.
OTT, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
477 So. 2d 655, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.