Dixon v. State
591 So. 2d 1151, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 677, 1992 WL 10910
This text of 591 So. 2d 1151 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dixon v. State, 591 So. 2d 1151, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 677, 1992 WL 10910 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
The challenged judgments of conviction are affirmed. Because the court failed to make the necessary findings when sentencing the appellant as a habitual felony offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, the sentences are vacated and this case is remanded for resentencing. See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla.1985), and Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walker v. State
462 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Roberts v. State
559 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
591 So. 2d 1151, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 677, 1992 WL 10910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.