City of Miami v. Rolle
446 So. 2d 1134, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12418
Opinion
The final order under review is affirmed.1 We agree with the trial court that
“... the time frame required by the Dade County Home Rule Charter, Article 5, Section 5.03, for the placing of a City Charter Amendment on the ballot for its citizens has not been complied with by the CITY OF MIAMI in that Ordinance No. 9776 was not passed and adopted on second and final reading until January 19, 1984, and therefore was not submitted to the electors timely."
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Miami v. Rolle, 446 So. 2d 1134, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
446 So. 2d 1134 (City of Miami v. Rolle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nunez v. City of Hialeah
477 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Balboa v. State
446 So. 2d 1134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)